Reported provisions would weaken wildlife safeguards, sideline federal scientists and make it harder to hold agencies accountable
WASHINGTON, D.C.

Defenders of Wildlife today strongly condemned Endangered Species Act provisions reportedly included in a Senate permitting package, warning they would weaken critical protections for imperiled wildlife.

“If it comes to pass, this deal would bulldoze America's most important wildlife law,” said Andrew Bowman, president and CEO of Defenders of Wildlife. “We can build the infrastructure America needs without sacrificing the wildlife we have a responsibility to protect and that Americans cherish. Development should not come at the expense of science, accountability or the ability of America’s most imperiled wildlife to survive.”

The reported agreement would make sweeping changes to the Endangered Species Act, which requires federal agencies to ensure actions they authorize, fund or carry out do not jeopardize threatened and endangered species or destroy or adversely modify their critical habitat. Consultations on the impacts of projects on endangered species under the ESA are already fast – with the median formal consultation lasting just two months, and the median informal consultation lasting just two weeks.  

Among other changes, the proposal would:

  • Condense endangered species reviews, cut key consultation timelines and create new onerous avenues for project applicants to challenge delays in court.
  • Shift significant federal responsibilities under the ESA to states, including some consultation and incidental take responsibilities.
  • Rewrite requirements governing the “best scientific and commercial data available,” prescribing how agencies evaluate data, models and scientific uncertainty.
  • Exempt certain right-of-way projects from key ESA consultation requirements.
  • Restrict judicial review of ESA decisions.
  • Change injunctive standards to tie the hands of judges and allow a project to continue even if a judge finds that it violates the law.

Taken together, these provisions go far beyond improving permitting efficiency. They would weaken the scientific review, federal oversight and accountability at the heart of the Endangered Species Act.

“Congress should be looking for ways to make permitting more efficient rather than a Trojan horse to weaken the Endangered Species Act,” Bowman said. “Efficiency and conservation are not opposing goals. A durable permitting bill should deliver both. Congress should not lock in permanent damage to the Endangered Species Act simply to get a deal today.”

Defenders of Wildlife will closely review the legislation and urge senators to reject provisions that weaken the Endangered Species Act.

### 

For nearly 80 years, Defenders of Wildlife has worked to protect and restore America’s wildlife at risk of extinction, advancing a vision of a future in which wildlife thrives, sustained by broad public support and a resilient network of healthy lands and waters. With a network of more than 2 million supporters, Defenders is an advocate for innovative solutions to safeguard wildlife for generations to come. To learn more, please visit https://defenders.org/newsroom or follow us on Instagram @defendersofwildlife.  

 

Media Contact

Communications Specialist
kirby@defenders.org
(202) 772-3268

News

Image
Jake Li Testimony at EPW
WASHINGTON, D.C.

A Much-Needed Win for Wildlife: Senate Introduces Bill to Improve Endangered Species Act Implementation

Senators Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Pete Rickets (R-NE) today introduced the Improving Species Recovery Act, an important bipartisan bill that would improve implementation of the Endangered Species Act.
Image
Porcupine caribou making its way through deep snow on the East Fork of the Chandalar River
WASHINGTON, D.C.

Enough is Enough: Senate Blocks Yet Another Attempt to Prioritize Drilling in the Arctic

The Senate today blocked an attempt to pass S. 5438, introduced by Senator Dan Sullivan (R-AK). The bill would have ratified and approved all authorizations, permits, verifications, extensions, biological opinions, incidental take statements and any other approvals or orders issued pursuant to federal law necessary for the establishment and administration of the Coastal Plain oil and gas leasing program, among other purposes.