WASHINGTON, D.C.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service quietly rescinded its Refuge System Strategic Growth Policy in December, bypassing the legally required public comment period for such a change, despite having issued the policy with an accompanying public comment period in 2014. The policy provides a framework to guide where the FWS creates and expands refuges, an essential tool for preserving beloved American landscapes and protecting imperiled wildlife and habitats. The FWS explained the recission as “necessary to ensure the Service is aligned with administration priorities.”

“Quietly killing this critical policy speaks volumes about how the Trump administration is dismissing the Refuge System and ignoring the law, which mandates the Service facilitate its continued growth,” said Christian Hunt, director of national wildlife refuges and parks program at Defenders of Wildlife. “The Service’s rationale for its actions exemplifies a disturbing disregard for Congressional intent and could be catastrophic to imperiled species and migratory birds that are already suffering from diminishing habitat.”

###

For nearly 80 years, Defenders of Wildlife has worked to protect and restore America’s wildlife at risk of extinction, advancing a vision of a future in which wildlife thrives, sustained by broad public support and a resilient network of healthy lands and waters. With a network of more than 2 million supporters, Defenders is an advocate for innovative solutions to safeguard wildlife for generations to come. To learn more, please visit https://defenders.org/newsroom or follow us on Instagram @defendersofwildlife.  

 

Media Contact

Communications Specialist
kirby@defenders.org
(202) 772-3268

News

Image
2019.08.07 - Florida Panther looking straight at camera - MS 45 - fStop Foundation
WASHINGTON, D.C.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Memo Underscores Trump Administration’s All-Fronts War on Wildlife

Brian Nesvik, director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, issued a memorandum explaining to FWS staff that the Endangered Species Act’s prohibition on unauthorized “take” applies only to affirmative acts intentionally and purposefully directed at a particular animal. This follows the Trump administration’s rescission of the regulatory definitions of “harm” under the ESA, which took effect this week.
Image
A close up of the face of a Sierra Nevada Red Fox at the edge of a forest in Deschutes County, Oregon.
Washington, D.C.

Court Rules Habitat Must Be Protected After FWS Attempts to Waive Protections for Less Than 40 Sierra Nevada Red Fox

Defenders of Wildlife earned a significant victory for the Endangered Species Act today when a federal district court found that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's decision to not designate critical habitat for the endangered Sierra Nevada red fox was a violation of the law.