Press Release from Defenders of Wildlife, Animal Welfare Institute, Red Wolf Coalition and Southern Environmental Law Center

For Immediate Release: September 29, 2016

Contacts:

Kathleen Sullivan, SELC, 919-945-7106 or ksullivan@selcnc.org

Kim Wheeler, Red Wolf Coalition, Inc., 252-796-5600 or kwheeler@redwolves.com
Haley McKey, Defenders of Wildlife,  202-772-0247 or hmckey@defenders.org
Amey Owen, AWI, 202-446-2128 or amey@awionline.org

 

Court Stops U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service from Capturing and Killing Wild Red Wolves

World’s population down to 29 known wild Red Wolves after USFWS ended protective efforts

 

CHAPEL HILL, N.C. – The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina today issued a preliminary injunction that orders the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to stop capturing and killing—and authorizing private landowners to capture and kill—members of the rapidly dwindling population of wild Red Wolves. On behalf of Defenders of Wildlife, the Animal Welfare Institute and the Red Wolf Coalition, the Southern Environmental Law Center argued in a court hearing on September 14 that a preliminary injunction was needed to stop the agency from harming these native wolves in the wild. Earlier that week, the agency announced its proposal to remove most members of the world’s only wild population of Red Wolves that roam a five county area in northeastern North Carolina and put them into captivity, abandoning all protective efforts except in one refuge where one pack lives and in a bombing range.

“This is a great day for Red Wolves and for anyone who loves nature in eastern North Carolina,” said Sierra Weaver, senior attorney for the Southern Environmental Law Center. “The court was clear that it’s the Fish and Wildlife Service’s job to conserve this endangered species, not drive it to extinction.  The agency cannot simply abandon that responsibility.”

The groups brought the federal agency to court for its failure to protect the world’s only wild population of Red Wolves—previously estimated to be over 100 animals.  Court filings detail a population decline of 50 percent over the course of two years, as well as the agency’s ongoing actions and inactions that imperiled the survival and recovery of the species in the wild. Previously, USFWS stopped key conservation actions and began authorizing private landowners to kill Red Wolves on their land. It also has been capturing wolves throughout the five-county Red Wolf recovery area in North Carolina, and holding them for weeks or months before releasing them into unfamiliar territory, separated from their mates and pack. 

“This wolf is running out of time. We have a short window to put Red Wolves back on a path to recovery or we will lose the last wild population in America,” said Former Defenders of Wildlife President and CEO Jamie Rappaport Clark. “The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service needs to get its Red Wolf program back on track and start taking actions that will help, not hinder, recovery.”

A strong majority of North Carolinians support the effort to recover the native Red Wolf, according to a new poll conducted by Tulchin Research. The new poll revealed that 73 percent of North Carolinians said they support Red Wolf recovery. The survey also found that over 80 percent of registered voters throughout North Carolina believe the USFWS should make every effort to help the endangered Red Wolf population recover and prevent its extinction.

“"We are pleased the court recognized that allowing the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to issue lethal and non-lethal permits for the removal of Red Wolves from the wild, was a pathway to extinction, not recovery,” said Kim Wheeler, executive director, Red Wolf Coalition.

As one example of USFWS’s failure to protect Red Wolves, the groups cite its 2015 authorization of a private landowner to kill a breeding female that was exhibiting denning behavior, after minimal efforts by the agency to save the animal.  The private landowner shot and killed the Red Wolf in June 2015, even though the wolf had not caused any problems. Under the Endangered Species Act, it is unlawful for anyone to “take” (i.e., harass, harm or kill) a Red Wolf, except in limited circumstances. Federal regulations authorize USFWS to issue permits to take Red Wolves on private property after a property owner requests that wolves be removed from their property and the agency abandons efforts to capture them.  For twenty years USFWS only allowed the taking of “problem wolves,” those that threatened human safety or property, yet it recently expanded its activities to capture -- and in some cases allow private landowners to kill – any wolves that enter private land. 

The USFWS announced in June 2015 that it would suspend the reintroduction of Red Wolves into eastern North Carolina. The agency also stopped its adaptive management for the population which has been critical to reducing hybridization with coyotes.

Both lethal and non-lethal takes are destroying the wild Red Wolf population,” said Tara Zuardo, wildlife attorney with the Animal Welfare Institute. “It is reassuring that the court recognized the importance of fostering the recovery of this endangered species."

Red wolves bred in captivity were reintroduced on a North Carolina peninsula within their native range in the late 1980s after the species was declared extinct in the wild. Once common throughout the Southeast, intensive predator control programs and loss of habitat decimated wild Red Wolf populations.

 

###

Note to Editors: Photographs of Red Wolves in North Carolina are available for use with appropriate photo credit from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service at http://www.fws.gov/redwolf/

About the Red Wolf Coalition
The Red Wolf Coalition (www.redwolves.com) advocates for the long-term survival of Red Wolf populations by teaching about the Red Wolf and by fostering public involvement in Red Wolf conservation.

About the Animal Welfare Institute
The Animal Welfare Institute (awionline.org) is a nonprofit charitable organization founded in 1951 and dedicated to reducing animal suffering caused by people. AWI engages policymakers, scientists, industry, and the public to achieve better treatment of animals everywhere—in the laboratory, on the farm, in commerce, at home, and in the wild.

About Defenders of Wildlife
Defenders of Wildlife is dedicated to the protection of all native animals and plants in their natural communities. With more than 1 million members and activists, Defenders of Wildlife is a leading advocate for innovative solutions to safeguard our wildlife heritage for generations to come. For more information, visit www.defenders.org.

About the Southern Environmental Law Center
The Southern Environmental Law Center is a regional nonprofit using the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC's team of nearly 60 legal and policy experts represent more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy, air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation, and land use. www.SouthernEnvironment.org

 

For over 75 years, Defenders of Wildlife has remained dedicated to protecting all native animals and plants in their natural communities. With a nationwide network of nearly 2.1 million members and activists, Defenders of Wildlife is a leading advocate for innovative solutions to safeguard our wildlife for generations to come. To learn more, please visit https://defenders.org/newsroom or follow us on X @Defenders.

  

News

Image
Mexican gray wolf
Washington, D.C.

Defenders Awarded Wildlife Conservation Grant from Foxwynd Foundation

Defenders of Wildlife and the Foxwynd Foundation today announce a partnership in wildlife conservation through a generous donation provided by the Foxwynd Foundation's Donor Advised Fund.
Image
Red-cockaded woodpecker feasts on a bug
Washington, DC

Defenders 'Disappointed’ by Downlisting of Red Cockaded Woodpecker

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service today downlisted the red-cockaded woodpecker from endangered to threatened status under the Endangered Species Act, a decision conservation groups