"The blanket 4(d) rule has protected threatened species by default for more than 40 years, all while preserving the Service’s flexibility to tailor species-specific protective regulations. This rule is well-rooted in the law and sound principles of conservation biology. Defenders stood behind the previous administration’s reinstatement of this rule, and we will stand behind it now.”

Mike Senatore, senior vice president of conservation programs, Defenders of Wildlife
Washington, DC

Defenders of Wildlife has filed a motion to intervene as a defendant in a case challenging the reinstatement of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s “blanket 4(d) rule,” which extends the Endangered Species Act’s section 9 protections for endangered species against unauthorized “take” to also include threatened species by default. The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation and the Property and Environment Research Center filed suit in federal court for the District of Montana, Butte Division, on March 10.

"The blanket 4(d) rule has protected threatened species by default for more than 40 years, all while preserving the Service’s flexibility to tailor species-specific protective regulations,” said Mike Senatore, senior vice president of conservation programs for Defenders of Wildlife. “This rule is well-rooted in the law and sound principles of conservation biology. Defenders stood behind the previous administration’s reinstatement of this rule, and we will stand behind it now.”

The first Trump administration rescinded the longstanding blanket 4(d) rule in 2019, undermining protections for threatened species over Defenders’ vigorous objections. In 2024, the Biden administration reinstated the rule, firmly grounding its decision in the text and legislative history of the ESA, as well as sound biological reasoning. Plaintiffs allege that the rule exceeds the agency’s statutory authority and violates decision-making requirements.

Section 9 of the ESA prohibits unauthorized take of endangered species whether intentional or accidental (such as harassment, harm, wounding, or killing); as well as unauthorized commercial trade. Section 4(d) requires FWS to issue key regulations for the conservation and full recovery of threatened species, and enables the automatic extension to threatened species of protections that endangered species receive. The Service first issued a blanket 4(d) rule for wildlife in 1975, followed by a blanket 4(d) rule for plants in 1977. The blanket 4(d) rule has protected hundreds of threatened species, including piping plovers, southern sea otters and manatees.

Jane Davenport and Daniel Franz, attorneys in the Biodiversity Law Center at Defenders of Wildlife in Washington, DC, and Timothy Bechtold of Bechtold Law Firm in Missoula, Montana, represent Defenders of Wildlife. 

For over 75 years, Defenders of Wildlife has remained dedicated to protecting all native animals and plants in their natural communities. With a nationwide network of nearly 2.1 million members and supporters, Defenders of Wildlife is a leading advocate for innovative solutions to safeguard our wildlife for generations to come. To learn more, please visit https://defenders.org/newsroom or follow us on X @Defenders.

  

Media Contact

Former Communications Specialist

News

Image
Public Domain
Washington, D.C.

House to Vote on Gutting Bedrock Endangered Species Act

As the nation celebrates Earth Day this week, the House of Representatives will cast an historic vote on a bill to eviscerate the Endangered Species Act, which was enacted more than 50 years ago to protect America’s wildlife from extinction.
Image
gray wolf walking with paw raised and looking at camera
Olympia, WA

Washington State 2025 Wolf Count Increases, Depredations Decrease

The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife today released the state’s 2025 minimum count for gray wolves at 270 individuals, a 17% increase from 2024