Washington, DC

The Trump administration announced today that it will finalize new regulations that roll back protections against extreme methods of killing predators and other wildlife in Alaska national preserves. National preserves are managed by the National Park Service (NPS) like national parks, except hunting and fishing are permitted. NPS’s new regulations for sport hunting and trapping in national preserves in Alaska defer to state management of predators, caribou, and other wildlife on national preserves in Alaska regardless of conflicts between state and federal goals or policies.


Alaska’s express goal for managing wildlife is to artificially increase game populations by driving down carnivore numbers. Its policy would allow hunters to bait, trap and snare bears, and kill black bears and cubs and wolves and pups in their dens. The proposed regulation would also remove the current prohibition against killing defenseless caribou from boats or shore as they swim across rivers in national preserves.


The NPS press release states that the final regulation “removes prohibitions adopted in 2015 on harvest practices, which are otherwise permitted by the state of Alaska.” It fails to mention that those practices include things like shooting bears and cubs, and wolves and pups, in their dens; snaring, trapping, netting and baiting bears; and using poison, smoke, and explosives to kill wildlife.


Jamie Rappaport Clark, former president and CEO at Defenders of Wildlife, issued the following statement in response to this regulatory rollback:


“The Trump administration has shockingly reached a new low in its treatment of wildlife. Allowing the killing of bear cubs and wolf pups in their dens is barbaric and inhumane. The proposed regulations cast aside a primary purpose of national preserves to conserve wildlife and wild places.”


Background


The state of Alaska adopted an intensive “predator control” law in 1994 designed to dramatically suppress wolves, bears and other native carnivores to artificially increase game populations. The state has since implemented aggressive predator management programs in areas across Alaska, which has included greatly liberalizing its sport hunting regulations statewide to reduce predator populations further.
 
The National Park Service promulgated regulations in 2015 that clarified that the state’s goal of reducing predators to boost prey populations was inconsistent with Park Service management obligations. Specifically, those federal regulations prohibited certain practices on national preserves, including bear baiting and snaring, shooting bears and cubs in dens, and shooting wolves and pups in dens.
In 2017, Congress passed a Congressional Review Act resolution rescinding the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s similar regulation protecting iconic carnivores on national wildlife refuges in Alaska. The U.S. Department of the Interior subsequently directed the National Park Service to reconsider its regulations, particularly where they diverge from state law.
 

For nearly 80 years, Defenders of Wildlife has worked to protect and restore America’s wildlife at risk of extinction, advancing a vision of a future in which wildlife thrives, sustained by broad public support and a resilient network of healthy lands and waters. With a network of more than 2 million supporters, Defenders is an advocate for innovative solutions to safeguard wildlife for generations to come. To learn more, please visit https://defenders.org/newsroom or follow us on Instagram @defendersofwildlife.  

 

News

Image
2019.08.07 - Florida Panther looking straight at camera - MS 45 - fStop Foundation
WASHINGTON, D.C.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Memo Underscores Trump Administration’s All-Fronts War on Wildlife

Brian Nesvik, director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, issued a memorandum explaining to FWS staff that the Endangered Species Act’s prohibition on unauthorized “take” applies only to affirmative acts intentionally and purposefully directed at a particular animal. This follows the Trump administration’s rescission of the regulatory definitions of “harm” under the ESA, which took effect this week.
Image
A close up of the face of a Sierra Nevada Red Fox at the edge of a forest in Deschutes County, Oregon.
Washington, D.C.

Court Rules Habitat Must Be Protected After FWS Attempts to Waive Protections for Less Than 40 Sierra Nevada Red Fox

Defenders of Wildlife earned a significant victory for the Endangered Species Act today when a federal district court found that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's decision to not designate critical habitat for the endangered Sierra Nevada red fox was a violation of the law.