For Immediate Release
Washington, DC

Today, about 100 conservation groups sent a letter to Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue opposing the State of Alaska's petition for rulemaking to exempt the Tongass National Forest in Alaska from the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (the Roadless Rule).

Defenders of Wildlife Director of Federal Lands, Peter Nelson, issued the following statement:

“Alaska's controversial petition to exempt the Tongass National Forest, our largest temperate rainforest, from the Roadless Rule condemns this vital landscape and the wildlife within. Rather than pushing for taxpayer subsidized roadbuilding to clear-cut priceless ancient forests, the State of Alaska should focus on restoring the Tongass’s watersheds and salmon runs that form the backbone of the region’s economy.

“Accepting this attack on the Roadless Rule will certainly lead to protracted and costly controversy while setting a dangerous precedent for undermining popular protections for national forests, wildlife and watersheds across the country.”

For nearly 80 years, Defenders of Wildlife has worked to protect and restore America’s wildlife at risk of extinction, advancing a vision of a future in which wildlife thrives, sustained by broad public support and a resilient network of healthy lands and waters. With a network of more than 2 million supporters, Defenders is an advocate for innovative solutions to safeguard wildlife for generations to come. To learn more, please visit https://defenders.org/newsroom or follow us on Instagram @defendersofwildlife.  

 

Media Contact

News

Image
2019.08.07 - Florida Panther looking straight at camera - MS 45 - fStop Foundation
WASHINGTON, D.C.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Memo Underscores Trump Administration’s All-Fronts War on Wildlife

Brian Nesvik, director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, issued a memorandum explaining to FWS staff that the Endangered Species Act’s prohibition on unauthorized “take” applies only to affirmative acts intentionally and purposefully directed at a particular animal. This follows the Trump administration’s rescission of the regulatory definitions of “harm” under the ESA, which took effect this week.
Image
A close up of the face of a Sierra Nevada Red Fox at the edge of a forest in Deschutes County, Oregon.
Washington, D.C.

Court Rules Habitat Must Be Protected After FWS Attempts to Waive Protections for Less Than 40 Sierra Nevada Red Fox

Defenders of Wildlife earned a significant victory for the Endangered Species Act today when a federal district court found that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's decision to not designate critical habitat for the endangered Sierra Nevada red fox was a violation of the law.