For Immediate Release
Washington, DC

Today, more than one hundred organizations, led by the Southern Environmental Law Center, submitted comments opposing the Department of the Interior’s proposed revisions to its regulations implementing the Freedom of Information Act. The proposed amendments would make it more difficult for the public to access records in the possession of Interior agencies and bureaus, leaving the public in the dark on department operations. They would also create new layers of secrecy, bureaucracy, confusion, and uncertainty and would ultimately lead to more litigation to compel release of public records. Finally, the comments detailed how the proposed rules violate congressional mandates in the Freedom of Information Act, as well as the Administrative Procedure Act, the National Environmental Policy Act and the Federal Vacancies Reform Act.

Bob Dreher, Senior Vice President of Conservation Programs, Defenders of Wildlife:

“In the name of supposed efficiency, the Department of the Interior has constructed new layers of secrecy, bureaucracy, confusion and uncertainty in an ongoing effort to bar the American public from information maintained by their own government. These revisions are unlawful and anathema to the spirit of the Freedom of Information Act. Our wildlife, public lands and environmental health will suffer the consequences if these rules are allowed to stand.”

Kym Hunter, Senior Attorney, Southern Environmental Law Center:

“It’s never a good idea scrap the rules that let the public know what the government is up to, but this could be the worst time in our history. This attempt by Trump’s Department of Interior to shroud itself in secrecy and keep documents from the public makes clear what we have known for a long time – its interests lie in protecting polluters and resource extractors, not the special places, endangered species and natural resources that Americans have entrusted to its care. It’s no surprise that so many groups from all across the country have signed onto comments opposing this latest outrage.”

Background:

As an advocate for the public interest, Defenders of Wildlife has requested government documents under the Freedom of Information Act to expose and explain important federal processes that affect American public lands and wildlife. These efforts have been featured in national news articles that have reported on the Department of the Interior’s attempt to plow a road through Izembek National Wildlife Refuge and construct new border wall though Lower Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge. Defenders has also filed litigation to compel the federal government’s response to six Freedom of Information Act requests for information relevant to threatened oil exploration and leasing in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

For nearly 80 years, Defenders of Wildlife has worked to protect and restore America’s wildlife at risk of extinction, advancing a vision of a future in which wildlife thrives, sustained by broad public support and a resilient network of healthy lands and waters. With a network of more than 2 million supporters, Defenders is an advocate for innovative solutions to safeguard wildlife for generations to come. To learn more, please visit https://defenders.org/newsroom or follow us on Instagram @defendersofwildlife.  

 

Media Contact

News

Image
Salt Marsh - Cumberland Island
ST. MARYS, GEORGIA

NPS Land Swaps and Visitor Plan Open the Door to Devastating Impacts at Cumberland Island

In advance of a public hearing on proposed land exchanges on Cumberland Island National Seashore, Defenders of Wildlife called on the National Park Service to remedy a host of management issues facing one of the largest undeveloped barrier islands on the East Coast.
Image
2019.08.07 - Florida Panther looking straight at camera - MS 45 - fStop Foundation
WASHINGTON, D.C.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Memo Underscores Trump Administration’s All-Fronts War on Wildlife

Brian Nesvik, director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, issued a memorandum explaining to FWS staff that the Endangered Species Act’s prohibition on unauthorized “take” applies only to affirmative acts intentionally and purposefully directed at a particular animal. This follows the Trump administration’s rescission of the regulatory definitions of “harm” under the ESA, which took effect this week.