For Immediate Release

Today, Senators James Risch (R-ID), Joe Manchin (D-WV), Lamar Alexander (R-TN) and Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) introduced S. 3223 the “Recovering America’s Wildlife” (RAW) Act in the U.S. Senate.

The following statement is from Jamie Rappaport Clark, president and CEO of Defenders of Wildlife: 

“While we support funding wildlife conservation at every level, we oppose the RAW Act as currently written. Last February, we identified concerns with the legislation that was introduced in the House of Representatives that have not yet been fixed in this Senate version. 

“For instance, the RAW Act does not provide funding for federal agencies charged with managing federal trust species, fails to extend the proposed funding program to Native American tribes to conserve wildlife resources on tribal lands, and could allow badly-needed conservation funds to be directed to recreational investments like boat ramps that have no direct benefit for wildlife. 

“We encourage the Senate and House to address the shortcomings in this legislation and ensure that federal funding supports federal and state agencies and tribal governments that are essential partners in fish and wildlife conservation.” 

For nearly 80 years, Defenders of Wildlife has worked to protect and restore America’s wildlife at risk of extinction, advancing a vision of a future in which wildlife thrives, sustained by broad public support and a resilient network of healthy lands and waters. With a network of more than 2 million supporters, Defenders is an advocate for innovative solutions to safeguard wildlife for generations to come. To learn more, please visit https://defenders.org/newsroom or follow us on Instagram @defendersofwildlife.  

 

News

2019.08.07 - Florida Panther looking straight at camera - MS 45 - fStop Foundation
WASHINGTON, D.C.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Memo Underscores Trump Administration’s All-Fronts War on Wildlife

Brian Nesvik, director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, issued a memorandum explaining to FWS staff that the Endangered Species Act’s prohibition on unauthorized “take” applies only to affirmative acts intentionally and purposefully directed at a particular animal. This follows the Trump administration’s rescission of the regulatory definitions of “harm” under the ESA, which took effect this week.
A close up of the face of a Sierra Nevada Red Fox at the edge of a forest in Deschutes County, Oregon.
Washington, D.C.

Court Rules Habitat Must Be Protected After FWS Attempts to Waive Protections for Less Than 40 Sierra Nevada Red Fox

Defenders of Wildlife earned a significant victory for the Endangered Species Act today when a federal district court found that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's decision to not designate critical habitat for the endangered Sierra Nevada red fox was a violation of the law.
Visit the newsroom