The Service's decision for this population of Sierra Nevada red fox rests on a wrongheaded and unlawful regulation that creates a large loophole in the ESA’s requirement to designate critical habitat. Species like the fox that are threatened by factors such as climate change need even more attention to management threats like habitat loss—not less attention, as the Service’s unlawful regulation purports to allow

Ellen Richmond, senior attorney for Defenders of Wildlife’s Biodiversity Law Center
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA

Defenders of Wildlife today notified the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that it intends to sue over its failure to designate critical habitat for an endangered population of fewer than 40 known Sierra Nevada red foxes along the Sierra crest. The FWS decision deprives this imperiled population of important habitat protections under the Endangered Species Act. The agency has 60 days to remedy violations in the notice.  

“The Sierra Nevada red fox was thought to be extinct in California until a small population was discovered in 2010; its survival requires all the power of the Endangered Species Act,” said Pamela Flick, California program director for Defenders of Wildlife. “We urge the Service to do the right thing and designate critical habitat for this highly imperiled species.”

In 2021, FWS listed the Sierra Nevada red fox distinct population segment (specifically, the population that resides on the Sierra Nevada crest) as endangered under the ESA. The agency, however, also determined that it was “not prudent” to designate critical habitat — i.e. extend federal protections to certain habitat essential to species’ survival and recovery— because this fox population is chiefly threatened by factors such as climate change.

It is mandatory under the ESA that FWS must, to “the maximum extent” possible, designate critical habitat for species on the federal threatened and endangered list. Defenders of Wildlife is challenging both the agency’s determination and an underlying ESA regulation that provides unlawfully broad latitude to the agency to make “not prudent” determinations.

“The Service's decision for this population of Sierra Nevada red fox rests on a wrongheaded and unlawful regulation that creates a large loophole in the ESA’s requirement to designate critical habitat,” said Ellen Richmond, senior attorney for Defenders of Wildlife’s Biodiversity Law Center. “Species like the fox that are threatened by factors such as climate change need even more attention to management threats like habitat loss—not less attention, as the Service’s unlawful regulation purports to allow.”  

The Sierra Nevada red fox is a subspecies of montane red fox with two distinct populations; the Sierra Nevada Distinct Population Segment at issue here, which experts believe consists of between 18 and 39 individuals, resides in California’s Sierra Nevada; and, the Southern Cascades Distinct Population Segment that lives in the Southern Cascades of Oregon and California.  

For nearly 80 years, Defenders of Wildlife has worked to protect and restore America’s wildlife at risk of extinction, advancing a vision of a future in which wildlife thrives, sustained by broad public support and a resilient network of healthy lands and waters. With a network of more than 2 million supporters, Defenders is an advocate for innovative solutions to safeguard wildlife for generations to come. To learn more, please visit https://defenders.org/newsroom or follow us on Instagram @defendersofwildlife.  

 

Media Contact

Communications Specialist
jcovey@defenders.org

News

Image
2019.08.07 - Florida Panther looking straight at camera - MS 45 - fStop Foundation
WASHINGTON, D.C.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Memo Underscores Trump Administration’s All-Fronts War on Wildlife

Brian Nesvik, director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, issued a memorandum explaining to FWS staff that the Endangered Species Act’s prohibition on unauthorized “take” applies only to affirmative acts intentionally and purposefully directed at a particular animal. This follows the Trump administration’s rescission of the regulatory definitions of “harm” under the ESA, which took effect this week.
Image
A close up of the face of a Sierra Nevada Red Fox at the edge of a forest in Deschutes County, Oregon.
Washington, D.C.

Court Rules Habitat Must Be Protected After FWS Attempts to Waive Protections for Less Than 40 Sierra Nevada Red Fox

Defenders of Wildlife earned a significant victory for the Endangered Species Act today when a federal district court found that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's decision to not designate critical habitat for the endangered Sierra Nevada red fox was a violation of the law.